Podcast Host Avery Trufelman on How the Military Influences Outdoor Gear

Author
Podcast Host Avery Trufelman on How the Military Influences Outdoor Gear

Hit podcast "Articles of Interest" is all about Gear this season, so we spoke with the 99% Invisible host about outerwear, Arc'teryx, Gorpcore & more


Published: 10-23-2025

About the author

Daniel Varghese
Daniel Varghese
Daniel Varghese is an editor based in Brooklyn, NY. He covers gear, design, menswear, and endurance sports—at least when not biking between appointments.

Americans have always been obsessed with seeming tougher and more rugged than they are. When Europeans first came to the continent, completely unsure of how to survive in unfamiliar surroundings, they bought hard wearing buckskin jackets and breeches from the indigenous people they found living here. The garments were certainly functional, offering camouflage and warmth, but also considered quite stylish. By the 18th century, the look had become so popular in the colonies and in Europe that hunters nearly brought deer to extinction in Georgia and the Carolinas.

These kinds of insights, about why and how we wear what we wear, have been broadcast to listeners of the Articles of Interest podcast since 2018. What started as a spin-off show of 99% Invisible, a podcast about design and the built environment, has been produced independently by host Avery Trufelman since 2022. Trufelman has used the show to dive deep on a wide range of wearables, including episodes about wedding dresses, plaid flannel shirts, and why we still don’t have automated digital closets like the one in the 1995 movie Clueless.

Trufelman also devoted an entire season to the history of “American Ivy” style and its far-reaching impact on fashion around the globe. Along the way, the show racked up acclaim, including being deemed one of the best podcasts of the year by The New Yorker critic Sarah Larson in 2018, 2020, and 2022.

avery-trufelman-q&a-articles-of-interest-image

On the new season of the Articles of Interest, titled "Gear," Trufelman explores the relationship between the U.S. military and the outdoor industry. The relationship is beyond superficial: plenty of outdoor gear makers developed equipment for the military in their early days. Many, like Arc'teryx, Outdoor Research, Danner, and Mystery Ranch, still actively seek military contracts or produce tactical gear for Special Operations forces. And many fabrics outdoor enthusiasts seek out were developed for military use prior to trickling into consumer apparel.

Ahead of the new season's release, we reached out to speak to Trufelman to find out when the U.S. military really started dressing, if lucrative government contracts are actually what’s keeping your favorite mountaineering brand afloat, and whether learning about the connection has changed her relationship to raincoats.


The following conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity.

avery-trufelman-q&a-portrait-army-jacket

Adrian Trufelman | Image courtesy Articles of Interest

Past seasons of Articles of Interest have focused on Ivy style and luxury. What inspired you to look into technical outdoor clothing this time?

It started with the military. My grand project is about “American clothes.” You and I are speaking English, the most spoken language in the world and the relic of an old empire. Wherever our current empire is heading, my pet thesis is that our relic will be our clothes. America invented “ready to wear.” The fact that around the world when people go to buy clothes they buy them off a rack, is because of America. Billions of people wake up every day and dress like Americans. Even in many countries where the local dress is still viable, it’s often an option to wear a t-shirt and jeans.

So I’ve been trying to figure out the pillars of American dress. After the series about Ivy style, the next step being about the military made sense. Honestly, the fact that a lot of menswear comes from the military is a kinda basic, rudimentary TikTok fun fact.

Sure, it’s called an army jacket for a reason.

Yeah. Almost everything we think of as classic menswear—a peacoat, a button down shirt, a t-shirt with slacks—all of these items could be purchased from the military surplus stores that emerged after World World II. There’s a reason why everyone in the 1950s looks like they really knew how to dress, they had access to a bunch of cheap, well-made clothes from surplus stores.

These stores were so well stocked because of the atomic bomb. Almost everyone, including the companies making clothes for the military, thought the war was going to go on for like two years longer than it did. We made so much extra shit to get ready for an invasion of Japan. The Manhattan Project was obviously a secret. So when the war ended, all these really well-produced clothes flooded the civilian markets at prices that were cheap enough for everyone to buy.

"It’s easy to think of the military industrial complex as evil and scary. But on a day to day level, I don’t think the outdoor industry is as dark as I thought it might be."

MR-factory-4

Mystery Ranch archive and repair studio | Photo by Field Mag

So the military has relied on external companies for gear since at least before World War II?

Yeah, the Civil War is when the army starts needing gear on an industrial scale. But a lot of what the military was ending up with was bad. It’s around this point that the Quartermaster Corps, the part of the army in charge of handling food, travel logistics, and clothing design, established a stamp of approval to make sure the clothes issued to soldiers were good enough. This is part of what makes surplus later possible.

The Quartermaster Corps became responsible for figuring out how to help the military dress for operations in new environments. Its first real challenge came in the Spanish American War at the end of the 1800s, where soldiers faced heat they would not have in the Civil War. Khaki ended up being a good solution. The cold temperatures of World War I were also difficult. We had these long wool jackets for people in the trenches that really sucked—they were basically blankets. Too hot if you’re moving, but if you take it off, you have nothing.

The Quartermaster Corps began to wonder if they could make a jacket that could work in multiple environments. To do this, they enlist the help of a bunch of these newly famous outdoorsy guys and their companies. The U.S. Military hires L.L. Bean, by which I mean the literal guy Leon Leonwood Bean, and Eddie Bauer, again the man Eddie Bauer. Over time, their ideas find their way into a bunch of military garments.

1933-LL-Bean-Catalog

L.L. Bean Spring 1933 catalog | Photo courtesy L.L.Bean & Archival Clothing

With the help from some of these outdoor consultants, the Quartermaster Corps developed the Field Jacket, the classic piece that we think of as the army jacket. The product kind of “invents” layering. Which like, yeah duh, layering, but this was a new thing at the time. The early Field Jackets literally have instructions in them on how to properly layer your clothes. You’d use the jacket with a rain layer or a warm layer, depending on the conditions.

The American military comes out looking a little ragamuffin-y, compared to the suited armies of other countries. But items like the Field Jacket were designed more scientifically, after actually asking soldiers what they needed. It’s a product that was really in keeping with the ideals of a democratic army, instead of just trying to do something a general wanted or that was imitating something else.

Are companies like L.L. Bean and Eddie Bauer still involved with the military now?

They’ve had tangos over the last century, but they’re not so much involved now. It’s not like a company just sort of hops into bed with the military and stays there. They all have different relationships. But if you’re part of the outdoor industry, it’s likely you have an inextricable tie to the military. You could be working with a material that was developed by or for the military, have worked with the military in the past, or, of course, be an active military contractor. I’m not trying to vilify it, I just think it’s fascinating.

What’s really changed since the time we’ve been talking about is that our army is much smaller again. And a lot of it is really specialized. The people on the ground tend to be special operators that work under the cone of silence and get a lot of leeway to do their jobs. They also have more freedom to wear whatever they want to wear. Some get a discretionary budget to buy whatever, so they shop from high-end outdoor equipment brands that are catering to them.

I think this kind of gear is at least in part responsible for Gorpcore. I mean, take a look at Arc’teryx Leaf [Editor’s Note: It’s now called Arc’teryx Pro]. It’s awesome. It’s black, the logo is low-key, and it’s really nice. A friend of mine used to be a buyer at Totokaelo, where they didn’t stock mainline Canada Goose but did stock gear from the more tactical line. Another big one is Salomon. Their shoes for special operators are so fucking cool. They’re black, they’re light. I almost bought a pair.

avery-trufelman-q&a-salomon-mens-black-xa-forces-shoes

Salomon Forces boots | Image courtesy Salomon

Are military contracts a big part of how the outdoor industry funds itself?

When I first stumbled onto this world of gear for Special Ops, I, of course, was like, oh this is where the dark money is. But there aren’t actually buckets of money to be made in catering to the Special Operations community. It’s tiny. There are only like 400 people in Delta Force.

Some companies can make money producing clothes for the mass military, like Outdoor Research. It told me about 20% of its business is tactical and 80% is civilian. But apparently the process can be a pain in the ass. The military does not work like a normal clothing company, where you have a regular production cycle that’s somewhat seasonal. They’ll apparently be like, we need 6,000 gloves in three months. Dealing with this can be a huge headache.

Has learning more about the connection between the outdoor industry and the military changed how you think about either?

It’s easy to think of the military industrial complex as evil and scary, and I went to some private military trade shows that made me cry. But on a day to day level, I don’t think the outdoor industry is as dark as I thought it might be. It’s not as dark as the weapons world, it’s way less of a problem.

I talked to a lot of veterans while working on this season. Many of them are people who saw some really bad shit who were really healed by the outdoors. As much as advertisements for the outdoor industry are like, the outdoors brings us together, the outdoors are healing. Nature is amazing in a way that society itself cannot always be.

Still, I went to this tradeshow for performance fabrics. Of course, everyone was talking about how wonderful and amazing and healing the outdoors is. But to get into the tradeshow, you had to walk by a tent encampment. There’s this really strict divide between what the country considers acceptable and unacceptable ways to be outdoors. There’s all this legislation in cities that makes pitching a tent illegal. The fundamental hypocrisy of it rubs me the wrong way.

I know the outdoor industry can’t necessarily be out there on the streets of Portland giving out tents even if they would like to. People would get mad at them, they’d be seen as exacerbating the problem. The fact of the matter is that a huge portion of Americans, for lack of a social safety net, live in tents and jackets. It’s really sad.

outdoor-research-tag

Outdoor Research still produces gear in the USA | Photo courtesy OR

Has diving into this changed your personal relationship to technical outdoor clothing?

It’s so funny, I don’t wear this stuff. I keep doing shows about clothes I don’t wear. People were like, Oh you’re the preppy person! Oh, god. Oh no. I’m really not!

Same with this, I’m really not a GORP-y person. Someone asked me recently what I wear in the rain. I was like, literally nothing. I just, like, get wet. I’m so not about this, I’m such an indoor cat.

Next up, a complete guide to finding good vintage outdoor gear.