Hoka Tecton X 4 Testing Impressions
Feel on the Trail: Poppy, Grippy & Well-Cushioned
I’ve run in tons of carbon-plated road shoes, but never a carbon-plated trail shoe. While there is a specific and undeniable boost—the shoe has much more pop than something like Mount to Coast’s T1—the Tecton X 4 doesn’t have that “holy moly this changes everything” underfoot feel that characterizes road supershoes. Maybe one of these days I'll take them to the track just to see what kind of splits they could throw down.
Flat out, the shoe does not slip or budge on the trails. In all my runs, never once did I experience that little skid-scare where you think you’re going to butt-plant a steep section. Going up and down was like having little lightweight Jeeps on my feet—this shoe was made for this. That’s thanks to the Vibram Megagrip, a high-performance, sticky rubber outsole compound engineered to deliver traction on both wet and dry surfaces.
With its double-layer midsole, this shoe also notably cuts down on the trauma the body experiences during big efforts. After a full morning of launching off rocks on the steep descents around Chamonix, my (distinctly non-elite) body didn’t feel like I had done the numbers that I had. A 10-mile day with 5,000 feet of climbing would typically leave me really feeling it in my ankles and knees. Having run in the Tecton X 4, I felt just a normal amount of tired (that is, tired, but not wrecked).
On the Update: Versatile & More Stable
At a group run in Chamonix, Hayden Hawks, who has been a Hoka athlete for 10 years, said he has appreciated the versatility of all versions of the Tecton. “I actually won the CCC 100K in 2024 in the Tecton X 2.5. I was able to podium at Western States in that shoe, and then I also won Black Canyon 100K in that shoe," he told me. "And the reason I bring up those three is that they’re completely different races. Everything from more runnable desert-type terrain, like Black Canyon 100K to the mountains in Chamonix.” Hawks was on the team of elite athletes that tested early prototypes for the fourth iteration of the shoe and gave feedback for the final product. None of my test runs reached the 100-kilometer mark, but they did include the full span of surface variety, and the shoe felt good on all of them.
Hawks also admitted that while the Tecton X 3 was a solid shoe, there were noticeable differences between the 2.5 and the 3 that informed the design of the new model. “I really love that the Tecton X 4 feels more stable. It feels like you sit in the foam rather than on top of the foam. I felt like in the 2.5, I sat in the foam. In the 3, I felt like I sat on top of the foam. But the 4, it feels like you are back in the foam, like it was in the 2.5.”
I never ran in previous models, but I agree that the foot seems to fit inside the foam rather than on top of it. Those who were disappointed with the 3 might find themselves renewing their Tecton X loyalty with the 4.
As for Hawks, he was supposed to run CCC this year, a 100K with 20,000 feet of elevation gain, but injury kept him sidelined. If he had been able to start, he said he definitely would have run in the Tecton X 4.